Poorly written, very corny (derogative), needed more substance and realism to characters

Great quick read and keeps u interested the whole time

This book was so good! In my top ten this year so far

Smart, sweet, and just a bit cheesy (get it? Haha)—in a good way. I loved the academic setting and the science-y bits, and I appreciated the focus on women in STEM and their struggles. The characters were too genius-level and emotionally self-aware to feel real. Overall, it was a fun, nerdy romance with a healthy dynamic and a lot of heart.

Love. Love. Love. Funny. Emotional. Smart.

This book was amazing. I’ve gotten reviews saying this was more of a hard down enemies to lovers trope, but it wasn’t hard on. They argued but wasn’t enemies. Elsie was a slow burning. It was a lot of science talk, if you’re not into that then i don’t think it’s best to read but nonetheless, it was an amazing book, i think you should still read it.

Boring

That one hit home for me.

I’m not a fan…. I have red 3 of her books (love hypothesis, not in love, and love theoretically), and none of them stood out to me. As a “chronic” re-reader none of this books made me want to re-read them. I only one I thought was pretty good was love hypothesis, but still I didn’t like it enough to re-read it. I personally wouldn’t recommend this books to other people. So I wouldn’t get it if I were you….(no hate to the author!)

The beginning was so slow and to much science talk for me. Eventually when it picked up it was really good.